pics mech results

src/contents/results.tsx

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { useTabNavigation } from "../utils/TabNavigation";
 import { H5 } from "../components/Headings";
 import { useNavigation } from "../utils";
 import { DownloadLink } from "../components/Buttons";
-import { TwoHorizontal } from "../components/Figures";
+import { TwoHorizontal, TwoVertical } from "../components/Figures";
 
 
 export function Results() {
@@ -65,27 +65,63 @@ export function Results() {
             num={1}
             pic1="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/se-nose.png"
             pic2="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild8.png"
-         />
+          />
           <H4 text="pegRNA 2"/>
           <H5 text="Workflow"/>
           <p>Cotransfection of pPEAR_CFTR and PE2 and also 1 of the 14 pegRNAs to compare the transfection efficiency of all of our designed pegRNAs.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>
           <p>The pegRNAs lead to differing amounts of cells showing fluorescence, which, assuming comparable transfection efficiencies, indicates varying prime editing efficiency. The pegRNA7 showed the highest transfection efficiency (see Figure X).</p>
+          <div className="figure-wrapper">
+              <figure>
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild9.png" style={{height: "10%", width: "auto"}}/>
+                    <figcaption> <b>Figure X</b>XXXXX</figcaption>
+              </figure>
+          </div>
           <H4 text="pegRNA 3"/>
           <H5 text="Workflow"/>
           <p>We tried to transfect CFBE41o- cells with pDAS12124-preedited, our internal positive control, to check if a transfection of this cell line is possible. Furthermore we tried to co transfect the CFBE41o- with pPEAR_CFTR, PE6c and pegRNA4.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>
           <p>Transfection of CFBE41o- with pDAS12124-preedited was successful (see Figure X). After 24 hours a successful co transfection of pPEAR_CFTR with PE6c and pegRNA4 was visible, although the transfection efficiency was really bad (see Figure X).</p>
+          <TwoVertical
+           description="Microscopy results after 24h or 48h. Transfection of pDAS12124-preedited with lipofectamine 3000 was successfully done in CFBE41o- cell line and visible after 48h. CFBE41o- cell line was transfected with pDAS-IDT with Lipofectamine 3000 and afterwards with LNPs including PE6c and pegRNA4 and was after 24h fluorescence visible."
+           num={2}
+           pic1="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild10-1.png"
+           pic2="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild10-2.png"
+           />
+          <div className="figure-wrapper">
+              <figure>
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/pe2-pe-co.png" style={{height: "10%", width: "auto"}}/>
+                    <figcaption> <b>Figure X</b> XXXX</figcaption>
+              </figure>
+          </div>
           <H4 text="pegRNA 4"/>
           <H5 text="Workflow"/>
           <p>pCMV-PE2 was co transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was co transfected with pDAS12489 in HEK293 cell line.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>
           <p>The FACS results show that transfection with pCMV-PE2 as the prime editing complex had editing efficiency of 52.90% when normalized on pDAS12124-preedited. When pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was used as a prime editing complex it had a transfection efficiency of 2.54% (see Figure X).</p>
+          <TwoVertical
+           description="Microscopy results after 72h. ."
+           num={3}
+           pic1="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild11-1.png"
+           pic2="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild11-2.png"
+           />
           <H4 text="pegRNA 5"/>
           <H5 text="Workflow"/>
           <p>We compared the 3 different Prime Editing complexes (pCMV-PE2, pCMV-PE2_CO-Mini & pCMV-PE6c) to check which one has the best transfection efficiency.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>
-          <p>The FACS measurement shows the fluorescence rate cells co-transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE6c as a prime editing complex. The editing efficiency off PE6c was by far the highest (81.88%) (see Figure X). The efficiency was 1.55 higher than the efficiency when pCMV-PE2 was used as prime editing complex (see Figure X).</p> 
+          <p>The FACS measurement shows the fluorescence rate cells co-transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE6c as a prime editing complex. The editing efficiency off PE6c was by far the highest (81.88%) (see Figure X). The efficiency was 1.55 higher than the efficiency when pCMV-PE2 was used as prime editing complex (see Figure X).</p>
+          <div className="figure-wrapper">
+              <figure>
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild13.png" style={{height: "10%", width: "auto"}}/>
+                    <figcaption> <b>Figure X</b> XXXX</figcaption>
+              </figure>
+          </div>
+          <TwoHorizontal
+          description="XXXXXXXXX"
+          num={4}
+          pic1="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/pe2-pe-co-pe6c.png"
+          pic2="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild12.png"
+          /> 
       </Subesction >
       <Subesction  title="Delivery" id="Results3">
       <H4 text="RNA Synthesis"/>