Update wiki/pages/engineering-design2.html

wiki/pages/engineering-design2.html

@@ -188,21 +188,27 @@ As mentioned we finished the testing aspect of our second engineering cycle just
         </p>
 
         <br><br>
-        <p><h3>F/OD of CspF Mutants - Test Results</h3><br>
-         <center> <img class="norm" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/design2.jpeg" alt="Image"></center>
-                 
+        <br>
+        <p><h3>Characterization of CspF Mutants in DH5alpha Strain:</h3</p>
+        <center><iframe src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/nupack-cspf-mutants.pdf" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe></center> </p>
+        <p><br><center><img class="norm" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/dh5alpha-sdm-graph-cp.jpg" alt="Image"></center></p>
+        <br>
+            <br>
+        <p><h3>Characterization of CspF Mutants in BL21(DE3) Strain:</h3</p>
+        <center><iframe src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/nupack-cspf-mutants.pdf" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe></center>
+        <br>     
         </p>
-        <p><br>
-        <br><center><img class="norm" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/bar-graph.jpeg" alt="Image"></center></p>
+        <p>
+        <br><center><img class="norm" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/bl21-graph-sdm-cp.jpg" alt="Image"></center></p>
         <br>
         <p><h3>NUPACK CspF Mutants</h3</p>
         <center><iframe src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4303/wiki/nupack-cspf-mutants.pdf" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe></center>
         <br>
         <p><h3>NUPACK ANALYSIS</h3></p>
-        <p><ul><li>From this, the least performing UTR Mutant 23 clearly has a very different structure. Mutant 10 has a similar structure but an RP of 0.21 times higher than Mutant 23. This could be probably because of the GC content of it being different?</li><li>
-Mutant 27 has the best expression and Relative Performance of 1.3. It’s structure is very different from the other UTRs. We need to perform 3D corrations.</li><li>
-Mutant 26 and 9 have similar structures and similar Relative Performances.</li><li>
-Mutant 3 and Mutant 5 have a similar structure and a similar Relative Performance.</li></ul>
+        <p><ul><li>From this, the least performing UTR SDM23 clearly has a very different structure. SDM10 has a similar structure but an Relative Performance 0.21 times higher than SDM23. This could be probably because of the GC content of it being different?</li><li>
+SDM27 has the best expression and Relative Performance of 1.3. It’s structure is very different from the other UTRs. We need to perform 3D corrations.</li><li>
+SDM26 and 9 have similar structures and similar Relative Performances.</li><li>
+SDM3 and SDM5 have a similar structure and a similar Relative Performance.</li></ul>
 </p>
         
   </div>