Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit aa4aa554 authored by Kaya Lange's avatar Kaya Lange
Browse files
parents 0e763a96 bf1f9ebe
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -53,12 +53,31 @@ export function Results() {
<p>The transfection efficiency was much better. Our proof-of-concept was working correctly. The reporter system pDAS12189 only led to production of a fluorescent signal when co transfected with a prime editing complex as pCMV-PE2.</p>
</Subesction>
<Subesction title="Mechanism" id="Results2">
<H4 text="Goals"/>
<p>text</p>
<H4 text="Workflow"/>
<p>text</p>
<H4 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>text</p>
<H4 text="pegRNA 1"/>
<H5 text="Workflow"/>
<p>With this experiment we wanted to compare the efficiency of pegRNAs with and without silent edits.</p>
<H5 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>The FACS analysis shows that pegRNA without silent edits (pegRNA1) had a 2.05 times higher transfection efficiency than pegRNA with silent edits (pegRNA2).</p>
<H4 text="pegRNA 2"/>
<H5 text="Workflow"/>
<p>Cotransfection of pPEAR_CFTR and PE2 and also 1 of the 14 pegRNAs to compare the transfection efficiency of all of our designed pegRNAs.</p>
<H5 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>The pegRNAs lead to differing amounts of cells showing fluorescence, which, assuming comparable transfection efficiencies, indicates varying prime editing efficiency. The pegRNA7 showed the highest transfection efficiency (see Figure X).</p>
<H4 text="pegRNA 3"/>
<H5 text="Workflow"/>
<p>We tried to transfect CFBE41o- cells with pDAS12124-preedited, our internal positive control, to check if a transfection of this cell line is possible. Furthermore we tried to co transfect the CFBE41o- with pPEAR_CFTR, PE6c and pegRNA4.</p>
<H5 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>Transfection of CFBE41o- with pDAS12124-preedited was successful (see Figure X). After 24 hours a successful co transfection of pPEAR_CFTR with PE6c and pegRNA4 was visible, although the transfection efficiency was really bad (see Figure X).</p>
<H4 text="pegRNA 4"/>
<H5 text="Workflow"/>
<p>pCMV-PE2 was co transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was co transfected with pDAS12489 in HEK293 cell line.</p>
<H5 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>The FACS results show that transfection with pCMV-PE2 as the prime editing complex had editing efficiency of 52.90% when normalized on pDAS12124-preedited. When pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was used as a prime editing complex it had a transfection efficiency of 2.54% (see Figure X).</p>
<H4 text="pegRNA 5"/>
<H5 text="Workflow"/>
<p>We compared the 3 different Prime Editing complexes (pCMV-PE2, pCMV-PE2_CO-Mini & pCMV-PE6c) to check which one has the best transfection efficiency.</p>
<H5 text="Conclusion"/>
<p>The FACS measurement shows the fluorescence rate cells co-transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE6c as a prime editing complex. The editing efficiency off PE6c was by far the highest (81.88%) (see Figure X). The efficiency was 1.55 higher than the efficiency when pCMV-PE2 was used as prime editing complex (see Figure X).</p>
</Subesction >
<Subesction title="Delivery" id="Results3">
<H4 text="RNA Synthesis"/>
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment