Figures

src/components/Figures.tsx

@@ -102,3 +102,5 @@ export function OneFigure({description, num, pic1, alt1}:FigureProps){
     )
 }
 
+
+

src/contents/results.tsx

@@ -165,7 +165,9 @@ export function Results() {
           <p>pCMV-PE2 was co transfected with pDAS12489 and pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was co transfected with pDAS12489 in HEK293 cell line.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>
           <p>The Flow Cytometry results show that transfection with pCMV-PE2 as the prime editing complex had editing efficiency of 52.90% when normalized on pDAS12124-preedited. When pCMV-PE_CO-Mini was used as a prime editing complex it had a transfection efficiency of 2.54% (see Figure 11, 12).</p>
-          <TwoVertical
+          <div className="row">
+            <div className="col">
+            <TwoVertical
           alt1=""
            description="Microscopy of HEK 72h post transfection with lipofectamine 3000. Co-transfection of pDAS12489 with pCMV-PE2 or pDAS12489 with LV-PE_CO-Mini. Both show fluorescence signals."
            num={11}
@@ -173,12 +175,18 @@ export function Results() {
            
            pic2="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/bild11-2.png"
            />
-           <OneFigure
+            </div>
+            <div className="col">
+            <OneFigure
            alt1=""
             pic1="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5247/photos/facs-results-mechanism/pe2-pe-co.png"
             num={12}
             description="Flow Cytometry analysis to compare prime editing complexes PE2 and PE_CO-Mini"
            />
+            </div>
+          </div>
+          
+          
           <H5 text="Workflow"/>
           <p>We compared the 3 different Prime Editing complexes (pCMV-PE2, pCMV-PE2_CO-Mini & pCMV-PE6c) to check which one has the best transfection efficiency.</p> 
           <H5 text="Conclusion"/>