Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 00d42fbd authored by Jincheng Lyu's avatar Jincheng Lyu
Browse files

Update results.html

parent 9e9507e9
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #364485 passed
......@@ -391,21 +391,21 @@
The plasmid BBa_K4907027 was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3), then the positive transformants were selected by kanamycin and confirmed by colony PCR and gene sequencing. The plasmid verified by sequencing was successfully transformed into <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3).
</p>
<!---Fig. 17--->
<!---Fig. 14--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/27.png" alt="">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 17 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907027_pET-28a(+) in E. coli BL21(DE3).</b> Target bands (506 bp) can be observed at the position around 500 bp.
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 14 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907027_pET-28a(+) in E. coli BL21(DE3).</b> Target bands (506 bp) can be observed at the position around 500 bp.
</div>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
After being cultivated and induced by 0.75 mM IPTG, the GE AKTA Prime Plus FPLC System was employed to collect purified protein from the lysate supernatant. CBM was verified by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 28).
After being cultivated and induced by 0.75 mM IPTG, the GE AKTA Prime Plus FPLC System was employed to collect purified protein from the lysate supernatant. CBM was verified by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 15).
</p>
<!---Fig. 18--->
<!---Fig. 15--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/28.png" alt="">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 18 SDS-PAGE analysis of CBM-his protein.</b> Target bands (11.9 kDa) can be observed at the position around 10 kDa.
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 15 SDS-PAGE analysis of CBM-his protein.</b> Target bands (11.9 kDa) can be observed at the position around 10 kDa.
</div>
</div>
......@@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
After purification, we got CBM-his successfully, although it was mixed with other proteins. Then the CBM-his was diluted to 10 M, and 10 M BSA was set as the negative control. 4 mL of 10 μM CBM and BSA was filtered three times by using cellulose filter paper and it was washed three times with Phosphate Buffered Saline (1×PBS). The eventual concentration of CBM and BSA was tested by the Bradford method after being diluted to the same volume. The result showed that CBM’s absorption at OD<sub>595</sub> is higher than BSA’s, illustrating that CBM can bind to cellulose effectively.
</p>
<!---Fig. 19--->
<!---Fig. 16--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/ctt/tt-cbmbsa.png" alt="" style="width:30%;">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 19 The concentration of CBM and BSA filtered by cellulose filter paper.</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 16 The concentration of CBM and BSA filtered by cellulose filter paper.</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -427,20 +427,20 @@
<div class="myPage-paragraph">
<h5 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h5"><b>mv<sup>140</sup>-linker-cbm-his and mv<sup>140</sup>-linker-his</b> </h5>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
To verify whether MV<sup>140</sup> can display heterologous proteins on the surface of the engineered bacteria or not, a His-tag (6×His) was fused to the C-terminal of MV<sup>140</sup>. We used both <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I0500" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_I0500</a> (araC/pBAD) and <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0034</a> to construct the expression system and obtained the composite parts <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907136" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907136</a> and <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907137" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907137</a> (Fig. 30) which are respectively assembled into the vector pSB1C3 by standard BioBrick assembly. The constructed plasmid was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, then the positive transformants were selected by chloramphenicol and confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing (Fig. 31).
To verify whether MV<sup>140</sup> can display heterologous proteins on the surface of the engineered bacteria or not, a His-tag (6×His) was fused to the C-terminal of MV<sup>140</sup>. We used both <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I0500" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_I0500</a> (araC/pBAD) and <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0034</a> to construct the expression system and obtained the composite parts <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907136" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907136</a> and <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907137" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907137</a> (Fig. 17) which are respectively assembled into the vector pSB1C3 by standard BioBrick assembly. The constructed plasmid was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, then the positive transformants were selected by chloramphenicol and confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing (Fig. 18).
</p>
<!---Fig. 20--->
<!---Fig. 17--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/30.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 20 Graphic description of the expression gene circuits for the protein display system. (a</b> BBa_K4907136 <b>b</b> BBa_K4907137)
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 17 Graphic description of the expression gene circuits for the protein display system. (a</b> BBa_K4907136 <b>b</b> BBa_K4907137)
</div>
</div>
<!---Fig. 21--->
<!---Fig. 18--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/31-1.png" alt="" style="width:80%;">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 21 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products. a</b> BBa_K4907136 pSB1C3 in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β. Target bands (2188 bp) can be observed at the position between 3000 bp and 2000 bp. <b>b</b> BBa_K4907137_pSB1C3 in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β. Target bands (2515 bp) can be observed at the position between 3000 bp and 2000 bp.
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 18 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products. a</b> BBa_K4907136 pSB1C3 in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β. Target bands (2188 bp) can be observed at the position between 3000 bp and 2000 bp. <b>b</b> BBa_K4907137_pSB1C3 in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β. Target bands (2515 bp) can be observed at the position between 3000 bp and 2000 bp.
</div>
</div>
......@@ -453,15 +453,15 @@
2% <i>L</i>-arabinose solution was added to induce the expression of the surface-display system. Then, we use the FITC-labeled anti-His-Tag antibody to target the fused His-tag (6×His) displayed <i>via</i> MV<sup>140</sup>, followed by measuring the fluorescence intensity and OD<sub>600</sub> of the culture.
</p>
<!---Fig. 22--->
<!---Fig. 19--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/32.png" alt="" style="width:50%;">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 22 The results of immunofluorescence to characterize the function of the two surface display systems.</b> Fluorescence intensity/OD<sub>600</sub> of <i>E. coli</i> DH10β whether express MV<sup>140</sup> or not. The left is for BBa_K4907136 (<i>p</i> = 0.004608) and the right is for BBa_K4907137 (<i>p</i> = 0.003578). <i>p</i>-value: no significance (ns), 0.0332 (*), 0.0021 (**), 0.0002 (***), <0.0001 (****).
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 19 The results of immunofluorescence to characterize the function of the two surface display systems.</b> Fluorescence intensity/OD<sub>600</sub> of <i>E. coli</i> DH10β whether express MV<sup>140</sup> or not. The left is for BBa_K4907136 (<i>p</i> = 0.004608) and the right is for BBa_K4907137 (<i>p</i> = 0.003578). <i>p</i>-value: no significance (ns), 0.0332 (*), 0.0021 (**), 0.0002 (***), <0.0001 (****).
</div>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
The results showed that the ratio of fluorescence intensity (fluorescence value/OD<sub>600</sub>) of positive control (bacteria harboring surface display system) is higher than that of negative control (bacteria without surface display system) (Fig. 32), which indicates that MV<sup>140</sup> can be successfully located on the surface of engineered bacteria.
The results showed that the ratio of fluorescence intensity (fluorescence value/OD<sub>600</sub>) of positive control (bacteria harboring surface display system) is higher than that of negative control (bacteria without surface display system) (Fig. 19), which indicates that MV<sup>140</sup> can be successfully located on the surface of engineered bacteria.
</p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
......@@ -543,17 +543,17 @@
coding sequence (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907035" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907035</a>)
and terminator (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0015</a>)
were used to construct a composite part <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4907145"
style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907145</a> (Fig. 33a), which
style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907145</a> (Fig. 20a), which
was then assembled into the vector pSB1A2 by standard BioBrick assembly. The constructed plasmid was
transformed into <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) successfully, then the positive transformants were selected by
ampicillin and confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing (Fig. 33b).
ampicillin and confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing (Fig. 20b).
</p>
<!---Fig. 23--->
<!---Fig. 20--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/33-hasa-circuit-colonypcr-1.png"
alt="" style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 23 Graphic description of the genetic circuit for HA
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 20 Graphic description of the genetic circuit for HA
production. a</b> DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products. (BBa_K4907145_pSB1A2 in <i>E.
coli</i> BL21(DE3). <b>b</b> Target bands (1690 bp) can be observed at the position between 2000 bp and
1500 bp).
......@@ -563,32 +563,32 @@
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) method was employed to measure optical density value at
λ<sub>400</sub> (OD400), which can calculate the concentration of hyaluronic acid according to the standard
curve in Fig. 34 (please see <a href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/experiments "><b>Experiment</b></a>
curve in Fig. 21 (please see <a href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/experiments "><b>Experiment</b></a>
for details). After that, we measure the concentration of hyaluronic acid in the fermentation broth of
engineered strain (<i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) with BBa_K4907144_pSB1A2), controlling by that of the <i>E.
coli</i> BL21(DE3) with pTet-B0034-<i>ecfp</i>-B0015_pSB1A2.
</p>
<!---Fig. 24--->
<!---Fig. 22--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/34-ha-standard-curve.png" alt=""
style="max-width:50%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 24 Standard curve of HA(R<sup>2</sup>=0.9490).</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 22 Standard curve of HA(R<sup>2</sup>=0.9490).</b>
</div>
</div>
<!---Fig. 25--->
<!---Fig. 23--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/35-ha-positivevsnegative.png"
alt="" style="max-width:30%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 25 The results of HA concentration measurement via the
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 23 The results of HA concentration measurement via the
CTAB method.</b>
</div>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
As shown in Fig. 35, the concentration of hyaluronic acid produced by our engineered strain was higher than
As shown in Fig. 24, the concentration of hyaluronic acid produced by our engineered strain was higher than
that of the control group. It demonstrated that the engineered strain was successfully constructed to
produce hyaluronic acid with 80 mg/L, which is consistent with the results in references.
</p>
......@@ -606,15 +606,15 @@
href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0015</a>) were used to
construct a composite part (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907143"style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907143</a>),
which was then assembled into the vector <ahref=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907147" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907147</a>_pET-28a(+) by
standard BioBrick assembly (Fig.36). Besides, the promoter (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K731500"style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K731500</a>),
standard BioBrick assembly (Fig.25). Besides, the promoter (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K731500"style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K731500</a>),
RBS (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0034</a>), <i>bcsB</i>
coding sequence (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907034"
style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907034</a>), and terminator (<a
href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_B0015</a>) were used to
construct another composite <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907144" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907144</a>,
which was assembled into the vector pSB4A5 by standard BioBrick (Fig. 36). The constructed two plasmids were
which was assembled into the vector pSB4A5 by standard BioBrick (Fig. 25). The constructed two plasmids were
transformed into <i>E. coli</i> Nissle 1917 (EcNP) successfully, then the positive transformants were
selected by ampicillin and kanamycin and confirmed by colony PCR (Fig. 36) and sequencing.
selected by ampicillin and kanamycin and confirmed by colony PCR (Fig. 25) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 26--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
......@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
To qualitatively determine whether our engineered bacteria can produce bacterial cellulose normally, we
coating bacteria broth of EcN (wild type), recombinant EcNP, and <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) on an agar plate with
Congo red. As shown in Fig. 37, recombinant EcNP exhibited the macroscopic red color because the Congo red
Congo red. As shown in Fig. 27, recombinant EcNP exhibited the macroscopic red color because the Congo red
bind to the bacterial cellulose produce by recombinant EcNP. It also demonstrated that recombinant EcNP
could produce bacterial cellulose.
</p>
......@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
The Congo red staining method was employed to measure the value of OD<sub>490</sub>, which can calculate the
concentration of bacterial cellulose according to the standard curve in Fig. 38 (please see <a
concentration of bacterial cellulose according to the standard curve in Fig. 28 (please see <a
href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/experiments ">Experiment</a> for details).
</p>
......@@ -673,12 +673,12 @@
<!--6-Produce hyaluronic acid in shake flask --->
To pay the way for co-culture, we investigated the growth and product synthesis rule of these two engineered
bacteria in a shake flask with 150 mL broth. As shown in Fig. 40, compared with the control group, the
bacteria in a shake flask with 150 mL broth. As shown in Fig. 30, compared with the control group, the
expression of hyaluronic acid doesn't have a negative effect on the growth of bacteria. Hyaluronic acid is a
secondary metabolite produced after 16 hours, of which the max concentration is 180 mg/L at the
20<sup>th</sup> hour (Fig. 40a).
20<sup>th</sup> hour (Fig. 30a).
However, we also observed a decrease in the hyaluronic acid concentration after
the cultivation for 20 hours (Fig. 40). We presume that the hyaluronic acid
the cultivation for 20 hours (Fig. 30). We presume that the hyaluronic acid
would be used as a carbon source by bacteria when the glucose was exhausted
after fermentation for 20 hours. Thus, further supplementing the glucose
at the 40<sup>th</sup> hour, we observe the increase of hyaluronic acid 3 hours later.
......@@ -686,11 +686,11 @@
the glucose was exhausted. So, the fed-batch is the best fermentation way to produce
hyaluronic acid in a bioreactor.
</p>
<!---Fig. 40--->
<!---Fig. 30--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/40-ha-flask-od400-600-1.png" alt=""
style="max-width:2000%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 40 The result of the shack flask fermentation.
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 30 The result of the shack flask fermentation.
a</b> The OD<sub>600</sub> versus time produced by recombinant <i>E. coli</i>
BL21(DE3) in shake flask culture. <b>b</b>The HA concentration versus time
produced by recombinant <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) in shake flask culture.
......@@ -709,19 +709,19 @@
So, we customized hardware for water retention
material production (please see <a href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/hardware">Hardware</a>
for details). The hyaluronic acid fermentation produced by the engineered strain
was carried out in the hardware with a 600 mL working volume. As shown in Fig. 41a,
was carried out in the hardware with a 600 mL working volume. As shown in Fig. 31a,
the max value of biomass (OD<sub>600</sub>) and hyaluronic acid concentration reached
16.91 and 782 mg/L (Fig. 41a), respectively. The biomass is 9.4-fold higher than that
16.91 and 782 mg/L (Fig. 31a), respectively. The biomass is 9.4-fold higher than that
in the shake flask, while hyaluronic acid concentration is 4.3-fold higher than that
in the shake flask. At the same time, the substrate (glucose) can be exhausted at last.
It demonstrated that the hardware is suitable for both bacteria growth and hyaluronic
acid production.
</p>
<!---Fig. 41--->
<!---Fig. 31--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/41.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 41 Hyaluronic acid production
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 31 Hyaluronic acid production
versus time in hardware. a</b> The concentration of HA (mg/L) and
biomass (OD<sub>600</sub>). <b>b</b> The glucose concentration,
NaOH (mL), and Feeding (g). HA: hyaluronic acid.
......@@ -734,17 +734,17 @@
<h6 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h6"><b>Produce bacterial cellulose in shake flask</b></h6>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
As shown in Fig. 42, the expression of bacterial cellulose doesn't
As shown in Fig. 32, the expression of bacterial cellulose doesn't
have a negative effect on the growth of bacteria, in which the highest
OD is 1.78. Bacterial cellulose is a secondary metabolite produced after 16 hours,
of which the max concentration is 95.9 g/L at the 63<sup>th</sup> hour.
</p>
<!---Fig. 42--->
<!---Fig. 32--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/42-bc-flask-product-od600.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:100%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 42 The result of the shack flask fermentation.
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 32 The result of the shack flask fermentation.
a</b> The OD<sub>600</sub> versus time produced by recombinant
<i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) in shake flask culture. <b>b</b> The BC concentration
versus time produced by recombinant <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) in shake flask culture.
......@@ -757,19 +757,19 @@
<h6 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h6"><b>Produce bacterial cellulose in hardware</b></h6>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
The bacterial cellulose fermentation produced by the engineered strain was carried out in the
hardware with a 600 mL working volume. As shown in Fig. 43a, the max value
hardware with a 600 mL working volume. As shown in Fig. 33a, the max value
of biomass (OD<sub>600</sub>) and hyaluronic acid concentration reached 16.93
and 603 mg/L (Fig. 43a), respectively. The biomass is 9.5-fold higher than that
and 603 mg/L (Fig. 33a), respectively. The biomass is 9.5-fold higher than that
in the shake flask, while hyaluronic acid concentration is 6.28-fold higher than
that in the shake flask. The total produce time reduced from 63 to 38 hours.
It demonstrated that the hardware is suitable for both bacteria growth and bacterial
cellulose production.
</p>
<!---Fig. 43--->
<!---Fig. 33--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/43-hardwareha.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 43 Bacterial cellulose production
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 33 Bacterial cellulose production
versus time in hardware. a</b> The concentration of BC (mg/L) and biomass
(OD<sub>600</sub>). <b>b</b> The glucose concentration, NaOH (mL), and Feeding (g).
BC: bacterial cellulose.
......@@ -790,16 +790,16 @@
and <i>rfp</i> coding sequence (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907037" style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907037</a>)
were used to construct a composite part <a href=" http://parts.igem.org/BBa_K4907147"
style="text-decoration:none;">BBa_K4907147</a>,
which was then assembled into the vector pET-28a(+) by standard BioBrick assembly (Fig. 44).
which was then assembled into the vector pET-28a(+) by standard BioBrick assembly (Fig. 34).
The constructed plasmid was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> Nissle 1917 (EcNP) successfully,
then the positive transformants were selected by kanamycin and confirmed by
colony PCR and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 44--->
<!---Fig. 34--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/44-rfp-pet-28a.png" alt=""
style="max-width:40%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 44 Graphic description of the
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 34 Graphic description of the
<i>rfp</i> genetic circuit</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
The bacterial culture was cultivated overnight,
and then the measurement of OD<sub>600</sub> and fluorescence
strength were carried out in triplicate. The pictures of OD<sub>600</sub>
versus time and fluorescent versus time were shown in Fig 45, which indicated
versus time and fluorescent versus time were shown in Fig 35, which indicated
the growth of EcNP. At the same time, the fluorescence value showed a linear
relationship with the OD<sub>600</sub> value (R<sup>2</sup>=0.9727) when OD<sub>600</sub>>2,
which was consistent with the results in the references (2). This means that when the
......@@ -817,25 +817,25 @@
regulation. The determination of OD<sub>600</sub>-t and fluorescence-t showed the
growth of EcNP. At the same time, we observed that when OD<sub>600</sub>>2, the
fluorescence of EcNP expression showed a linear relationship with its OD<sub>600</sub>
value (R<sup>2</sup>=0.9727) (Fig 46), which was consistent with the results in the
value (R<sup>2</sup>=0.9727) (Fig 36), which was consistent with the results in the
references (2). This means that when the OD<sub>600</sub> value of bacteria is higher
than 2, we can calculate the bacterial population density of EcNP in the mixed bacterial
broth through the fluorescence intensity measured, which provides strong support for the
co-culture regulation.
</p>
<!---Fig. 45--->
<!---Fig. 35--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/45-ecnp-rfp-kan.png" alt=""
style="max-width:80%">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 45 a</b> Growth curve of EcNP .
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 35 a</b> Growth curve of EcNP .
<b>b</b> RFP fluorescence intensity versus time of EcNP.</b>
</div>
</div>
<!---Fig. 46--->
<!---Fig. 36--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/46-ecnp-rfp-fluovsod.png" alt=""
style="max-width:45%">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 46 Fluorescence
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 36 Fluorescence
intensity/OD<sub>600</sub> of EcNP</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -852,14 +852,14 @@
which was then assembled into the vector pSB3C5 by standard BioBrick assembly.
The constructed plasmid was transformed it into <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3), successfully,
then the positive transformants were selected by kanamycin and confirmed by colony
PCR (Fig. 47) and sequencing.
PCR (Fig. 37) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 47--->
<!---Fig. 37--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/47-gfp-circuit-colonypcr-2.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:140%">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 47 a</b> A graphic description of the <i>gfp</i>
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 37 a</b> A graphic description of the <i>gfp</i>
genetic
circuit.
<b>b</b> DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products.
......@@ -879,21 +879,21 @@
our
subsequent co-culture regulation.
</p>
<!---Fig. 48--->
<!---Fig. 38--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/48-bl21-de3-gfp-curve.png" alt=""
style="max-width:100%">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 48 a</b> Growth curve of
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 38 a</b> Growth curve of
<i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) with BBa_K4907146. <b>b</b> Fluorescent intensity curve
of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) with BBa_K4907146.
</div>
</div>
<!---Fig. 49--->
<!---Fig. 39--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/49-bl21-de3-gfp-fluovsod.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:55%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 49 Fluorescence intensity/OD<sub>600</sub>
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 39 Fluorescence intensity/OD<sub>600</sub>
of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3).</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -903,46 +903,46 @@
concentrations of antibiotics</b>
</h4>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
We attempted to regulate the ratio of these two engineered bacteria through antibiotics, which was preferentially carried out in the shake flask. So, we culture the <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) harboring plasmid of J23100-B0034-<i>gfp</i>-B0015_pSB3C5 and EcNP harboring plasmid of J23100-B0034-<i>rfp</i>-T7t_pET-28a(+). Chloramphenicol and kanamycin were added to regulate the ratio of these two engineering bacteria, whose population quantity was characterized by the fluorescence intensity. After that, we could harvest the relationship between the concentration of antibiotics and the bacteria. As shown in Fig. 50 and Fig. 51 (data of EcNP and <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) respectively), the various concentrations of antibiotics could exert different degrees of inhibiting effect on the bacteria quantity. The changes in fluorescence intensity were also consistent with that of bacteria quantity. As shown in Fig. 52 and Fig 53 (data of EcNP and <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) respectively), various concentrations of antibiotics also have different effects on the growth rate of bacteria. These results will pave the way for the regulation of bacteria population quantity.
We attempted to regulate the ratio of these two engineered bacteria through antibiotics, which was preferentially carried out in the shake flask. So, we culture the <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) harboring plasmid of J23100-B0034-<i>gfp</i>-B0015_pSB3C5 and EcNP harboring plasmid of J23100-B0034-<i>rfp</i>-T7t_pET-28a(+). Chloramphenicol and kanamycin were added to regulate the ratio of these two engineering bacteria, whose population quantity was characterized by the fluorescence intensity. After that, we could harvest the relationship between the concentration of antibiotics and the bacteria. As shown in Fig. 40 and Fig. 41 (data of EcNP and <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) respectively), the various concentrations of antibiotics could exert different degrees of inhibiting effect on the bacteria quantity. The changes in fluorescence intensity were also consistent with that of bacteria quantity. As shown in Fig. 42 and Fig 43 (data of EcNP and <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) respectively), various concentrations of antibiotics also have different effects on the growth rate of bacteria. These results will pave the way for the regulation of bacteria population quantity.
</p>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/50-bc-cm.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:120%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 50 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth of EcNP. </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 34 μg/L. 68 μg/L. 136 μg/L ,and 340 μg/L, respectively.
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 40 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth of EcNP. </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 34 μg/L. 68 μg/L. 136 μg/L ,and 340 μg/L, respectively.
</div>
</div>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/51-ha-kan.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:120%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 51 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3). </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 50 μg/L. 100 μg/L. 200 μg/L ,and 500 μg/L, respectively.
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 41 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3). </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 50 μg/L. 100 μg/L. 200 μg/L ,and 500 μg/L, respectively.
</div>
</div>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/52-bc-cm-growth-rate.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:120%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 52 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth rate of EcNP. </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 34 μg/L. 68 μg/L. 136 μg/L ,and 340 μg/L, respectively.
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 42 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth rate of EcNP. </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 34 μg/L. 68 μg/L. 136 μg/L ,and 340 μg/L, respectively.
</div>
</div>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/53-ha-cm-growth-rate.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:120%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 53 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth rate of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3). </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 50 μg/L. 100 μg/L. 200 μg/L ,and 500 μg/L, respectively.
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 43 The effect of the antibiotic on the bacteria growth rate of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3). </b>The antibiotic concentration in <b>a</b>, </b>b</b>,</b> c</b>, <b>d</b>, and <b>e</b> was 0 mg/L, 50 μg/L. 100 μg/L. 200 μg/L ,and 500 μg/L, respectively.
</div>
</div>
<!--4 -Pave the way for co-culture fermentation --->
<h4 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h4"><b>Pave the way for co-culture fermentation</b></h4>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
The two engineered bacteria constructed were cultured in the shake flask to produce the hyaluronic acid and bacterial cellulose, which was mixed to produce water-retention material. As shown in Fig. 54, we can observe the flocculent water-retention material both in the mixed culture broth and sediment after centrifugation. Thus, we have successfully produced the water-retention material which has been applied in characterizing the water-retention efficiency in the soil (please see <a href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/proof-of-concept "> Proof of concept </a> for details).
The two engineered bacteria constructed were cultured in the shake flask to produce the hyaluronic acid and bacterial cellulose, which was mixed to produce water-retention material. As shown in Fig. 44, we can observe the flocculent water-retention material both in the mixed culture broth and sediment after centrifugation. Thus, we have successfully produced the water-retention material which has been applied in characterizing the water-retention efficiency in the soil (please see <a href=" https://2023.igem.wiki/xmu-china/proof-of-concept "> Proof of concept </a> for details).
</p>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/result/drought/fig-co-culture.png"
alt=""
style="max-width:80%;">
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 54 Co-culture results of these two engineered bacteria. a</b> co-culture broth. <b>b</b> sediment after centrifugation.
<div class=" myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 44 Co-culture results of these two engineered bacteria. a</b> co-culture broth. <b>b</b> sediment after centrifugation.
</div>
</div>
......@@ -977,19 +977,19 @@
<h4 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h4">Anti-toxicity of <i>ccdA</i></h4>
<h5 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h5">Molecular cloning</h5>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
We use pBAD (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206001 "><b>BBa_K206001</b></a>), RBS (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034 "><b>BBa_B0034</b></a>), <i>ccdB</i> (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3512001 "><b>BBa_K3512001</b></a>) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907139, which were assembled on pSB4K5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 50) and sequencing.
We use pBAD (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K206001 "><b>BBa_K206001</b></a>), RBS (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034 "><b>BBa_B0034</b></a>), <i>ccdB</i> (<a href=" http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3512001 "><b>BBa_K3512001</b></a>) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907139, which were assembled on pSB4K5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 40) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 50--->
<!---Fig. 40--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-50.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 50 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907139</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 40 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907139</b>
</div>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
We use pBAD (BBa_I13453), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdA</i> (BBa_K4907032) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907138, which were assembled on pSB1C3 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using chloramphenicol and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 51) and sequencing.
We use pBAD (BBa_I13453), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdA</i> (BBa_K4907032) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907138, which were assembled on pSB1C3 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using chloramphenicol and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 41) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 51--->
<!---Fig. 41--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-51.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
......@@ -1004,13 +1004,13 @@
Besides, the <i>E. coli</i> DB3.1 transformed with toxin controlled by pBAD promoter without antitoxin both grew better compared with <i>E. coli</i> DH10β. From these results, we can draw the conclusion that whether the <i>ccdA</i> is in plasmid or genome can play the role of neutralisation to <i>ccdB</i>.
</p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
Therefore, in light of the serious leak of BBa_K206001,we use pRHa(BBa_K914003), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdB</i> (BBa_K3512001) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907131,which were assembled on pSB4k5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into<i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin through colony PCR (Fig. 52) and sequencing.
Therefore, in light of the serious leak of BBa_K206001,we use pRHa(BBa_K914003), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdB</i> (BBa_K3512001) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907131,which were assembled on pSB4k5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into<i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin through colony PCR (Fig. 42) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 52--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-52.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 52 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907131</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 42 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products of BBa_K4907131</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -1023,25 +1023,25 @@
</h4>
<h5 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h5">Molecular cloning</h5>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">
We use pBAD/araC (BBa_I0500), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdB</i> (BBa_K3512201) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907140, which were assembled on pSB4K5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 53) and sequencing.
We use pBAD/araC (BBa_I0500), RBS (BBa_B0034), <i>ccdB</i> (BBa_K3512201) to construct the composite part BBa_K4907140, which were assembled on pSB4K5 backbone by standard assembly. This constructed circuit was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH10β, followed by positive transformant selection using kanamycin and confirmation through colony PCR (Fig. 43) and sequencing.
</p>
<!---Fig. 53--->
<!---Fig. 43--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-53.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 53 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products (BBa_K4907140).
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 43 DNA gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products (BBa_K4907140).
Promoter effect test</b>
</div>
<h5 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h5">Promoter effect test</h5>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">Given that BBa_K206001 and BBa_K4195005 both have serious leaks, we need to test if BBa_I0500 will leak. </p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">The <i>ccdB</i> circuit was induced by L-arabinose. Bacteria (<i>E. coli</i> DH10β harboring BBa_K4907140_pSB4K5 and BBa_I13453_pSB1C3) were induced with L-arabinose and glucose separately for 6 hours, with 3 replicates set for each. And the changes in OD<sub>600</sub> and CFU count before and after induction were measured.</p>
<!---Fig. 54--->
<!---Fig. 44--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-54.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 54 The function of BBa_I0500 was characterized by survival.a</b> OD<sub>600</sub> values of bacteria upon addition of L-arabinose (left) and glucose (right). p value:<b>b</b> CFU values of bacteria upon addition of L-arabinose (left) and glucose (right)
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 44 The function of BBa_I0500 was characterized by survival.a</b> OD<sub>600</sub> values of bacteria upon addition of L-arabinose (left) and glucose (right). p value:<b>b</b> CFU values of bacteria upon addition of L-arabinose (left) and glucose (right)
</div>
</div>
......@@ -1051,17 +1051,17 @@
<h5 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h5">Killing effect test</h5>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">The experimental group (<i>E. coli</i> DH10β harboring BBa_K4907140_pSB4K5 and BBa_I13453_pSB1C3), and the control group (<i>E. coli</i> DH10β harboring BBa_K206001_pSB4K5 and BBa_I13453_pSB1C3 ) were separately induced with L-arabinose, with 3 replicates set for each. Then measure OD<sub>600</sub> and CFU count at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours.</p>
<!---Fig. 55--->
<!---Fig. 45--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-55.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 55 Growth curve and survival assay for characterizing the function of <i>ccdB</i>. a</b> The value of OD<sub>600</sub> against time (h) for different groups. <b>b</b> CFUs/mL calculated of different groups are plotted against time (h).
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 45 Growth curve and survival assay for characterizing the function of <i>ccdB</i>. a</b> The value of OD<sub>600</sub> against time (h) for different groups. <b>b</b> CFUs/mL calculated of different groups are plotted against time (h).
</div>
</div>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">We used promoter <partinfo>BBa_I0500</partinfo> to regulate the expression of <i>ccdB</i>. After induction by <i>L</i>-arabinose, OD<sub>600</sub> values were measured every two hours. The bacteria that had no <i>ccdB</i> expressed grew rapidly, while the one expressing <i>ccdB</i> showed a significant growth defect, as the optical density (at 600 nm) increased very slightly (Fig. 55a).</p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">We used promoter <partinfo>BBa_I0500</partinfo> to regulate the expression of <i>ccdB</i>. After induction by <i>L</i>-arabinose, OD<sub>600</sub> values were measured every two hours. The bacteria that had no <i>ccdB</i> expressed grew rapidly, while the one expressing <i>ccdB</i> showed a significant growth defect, as the optical density (at 600 nm) increased very slightly (Fig. 45a).</p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">At each time, the spot assay was also performed, then the cell viability was measured by CFU count (Fig. 55b). Consistent with the trend of OD<sub>600</sub> value against time, only the absence of <i>ccdB</i> allowed the host cells to survive. All these results indicated that <i>ccdB</i> was toxic enough to the engineered bacteria so that this toxin could be applied to the cases when the suicide of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) were strongly needed.</p>
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">At each time, the spot assay was also performed, then the cell viability was measured by CFU count (Fig. 45b). Consistent with the trend of OD<sub>600</sub> value against time, only the absence of <i>ccdB</i> allowed the host cells to survive. All these results indicated that <i>ccdB</i> was toxic enough to the engineered bacteria so that this toxin could be applied to the cases when the suicide of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) were strongly needed.</p>
<h3 class="myPage-paragraph-headline-h3" id="childSection12">Kill switch</h3>
......@@ -1073,11 +1073,11 @@
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">We use pBAD/araC (BBa_I0500), inverter (BBa_Q04510), RBS (BBa_B0034 ), Terminator (BBa_B0015 ), mazF (BBa_K1096002) to construct the composite part BBa_K3332081.</p>
<!---Fig. 56--->
<!---Fig. 46--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-56.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 56 CFU assay for characterizing the killing effect of kill switch in detection system</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 46 CFU assay for characterizing the killing effect of kill switch in detection system</b>
</div>
</div>
......@@ -1093,11 +1093,11 @@
<p class="myPage-paragraph-content">We use pBAD/araC (BBa_I0500), RBS (BBa_B0034), terminator (BBa_B0015), mazF (BBa_K1096002) to construct the composite part BBa_K3332083, which were assembled on pSB1C3 backbone by standard assembly. </p>
<!---Fig. 57--->
<!---Fig. 47--->
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig">
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/result/fig-57.png" alt=""
style="max-width:120%">
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 57 survival Ratio of different groups against time (h).</b>
<div class="myPage-paragraph-fig-description"><b>Fig. 47 survival Ratio of different groups against time (h).</b>
</div>
</div>
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment