diff --git a/src/contents/engineering.tsx b/src/contents/engineering.tsx
index 74984d94bcb1c469944f0b4a83fcc0812e365a89..75b41edff91118c94b65b8f0e9868059e1c7d926 100644
--- a/src/contents/engineering.tsx
+++ b/src/contents/engineering.tsx
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ export function Engineering() {
                         </p>
                         <H4 text="Test" id="text"/>
                         <p>
-                        To compare the prime editing performances of M-MLV RT (PE2) and PE<sup>CO</sup>-Mini RT, both were tested using a 2in1 prime editing reporter plasmid system<TabScrollLink tab="tab-pe-systems" num="12" scrollId="desc-12"/> (see <a onClick={() => goToPageWithTabAndScroll({scrollToId: 'Proof of Concept', path: '/engineering', tabId: 'tab-proof-of-concept' })}>Proof of Concept[link]</a>) in HEK293 cells. Contrary to the findings of Gao et al., here the PE<sup>CO</sup>-Mini prime editor performed a lot worse than the PE2 prime editor.
+                        To compare the prime editing performances of M-MLV RT (PE2) and PE<sup>CO</sup>-Mini RT, both were tested using a 2in1 prime editing reporter plasmid system<TabScrollLink tab="tab-pe-systems" num="12" scrollId="desc-12"/> (see <a onClick={() => goToPageWithTabAndScroll({scrollToId: 'Proof of Concept', path: '/engineering', tabId: 'tab-proof-of-concept' })}>Proof of Concept</a>) in HEK293 cells. Contrary to the findings of Gao et al., here the PE<sup>CO</sup>-Mini prime editor performed a lot worse than the PE2 prime editor.
                         </p>
                         <H4 text="Learn" id="text"/>
                         <p>