diff --git a/wiki/pages/results.html b/wiki/pages/results.html
index 46a01e9b453e1cf4d8e0fcd74e960a0ecbf29e3c..e5315f342b75fa06acb91acd04f0f106e4d113d8 100644
--- a/wiki/pages/results.html
+++ b/wiki/pages/results.html
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 {% extends "layout.html" %}
   
 {% block title %}Results{% endblock %}
-{% block lead %}What we found{% endblock %}
+{% block lead %}Analyzing our Data{% endblock %}
 
 {% block page_content %}
 
 <div class="row mt-4">
   <div class="col-lg-12">
   <br>
-    <h2>Results<h2>
+    <h2>Results</h2>
     <hr>
   <br>
     <p>The Defluorinator project was created to remove PFOA from water systems. This can be done by breaking the carbon fluorine bond in PFOA which will cause the chemical to break down. Two enzymes haloacid and fluoroacetate dehalogenase were chosen to break the fluorine bonds in PFOA. Plasmid was put into E. coli.</p>
@@ -17,19 +17,18 @@
   <br>
   <center><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4191/wiki/culture-key-results.png"
         height="100"/>
-        </ center> 
+        </center> 
  <br>
      <center><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4191/wiki/screen-shot-2022-10-11-at-4-41-40-pm.png"
         height="300"/>
-        </ center> 
+        </center> 
   <p>Figure 1 displays the data found for pH vs. time. </p>
 <br>
-</ uncenter>
   <p>pH testing was done to determine the amount of fluorine ions that were present. As PFOA was degraded, there is a byproduct of free floating hydrogen and fluorine ions. The fluoride ions will bond with free hydrogen ions creating hydrofluoric acid (HF), an acidic compound.  The more HF that is being created, the more H+ in solutions we will be measuring, which means a lower pH level. The less free H+ in a system, the more basic it would be. As pH decreases, the amount of PFOA decreases.</p>
 <br>
      <center><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4191/wiki/screen-shot-2022-10-11-at-4-42-18-pm.png"
         height="300"/>
-        </ center>
+        </center>
     <br>
   <p>Figure 2 displays the data found for optical density vs. time. </p>
 <br> 
@@ -37,18 +36,20 @@
      <h2>Measuring Bacteria Growth</h2>
      <center><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4191/wiki/ph-vs-time-in-hours-for-cultures.png"
         height="500"/>
-        </ center> 
+        </center> 
     <br> 
    <p>Figure 3 portrays the data found for pH vs. time across the cultures. </p>
      <p>Measuring optical density was used to determine how efficiently the bacteria was growing in the presence of PFOA. The optical density will increase when there is more bacteria present in the solution.</p>
      <center><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4191/wiki/optical-density-o-d-vs-time-hours-for-cultures.png"
         height="500"/>
-        </ center> 
+        </center> 
    <br> 
      <p>Figure 4 depicts the data found for optical density vs. time.</p>
     <p>There is a strong positive linear correlation between optical density and time for all the cultures. As time increased, the optical density also increased. This means that both HaCD and FaCD were able to grow over the 54 hours.</p>
+    <br> 
     <h2>Errors</h2>
      <p>Our results also showed that after 26 hours the pH generally started to increase which could be due to several reasons. The gas form of HF produced could have left our system when opening the culture lids to test pH. pH might not have been the most efficient way to measure the degradation of data. The increase in pH after about 20 hours could also be due to all the PFOA being degraded, producing no more H+ ions. The degradation process could have also ceased to continue because our plasmid might not have been 100% efficient in producing these enzymes needed to break down 100% of the PFOA. Another reason could be that the bacteria itself produces basic metabolites to adjust to the environment, causing the solution to become more basic. This means that we cannot compare if the engineered HaCD or FaCD degraded more PFOA.</p>
+     <br> 
     <h2>Future Research</h2>
     <p>To further investigate the degradation process of PFOA by the engineered HaCD and FaCD, we would recommend using a different method for PFOA detection. Our experiments used pH because it was the most available option to our lab at that time. GC-Ms or LC-Ms methods could be used to determine how PFOA was degraded. If pH testing was to be used again, a closed system should be used so no HF gas escapes, increasing the pH.</p>
     <ul>